Archive

Archive for March, 2011

Who Refers Work to a Competitor?

March 17, 2011 1 comment


I took a call from a client. They asked for something that we can do but don’t do particularly well. I decided to refer the project to another shop that does that one thing very well. The other shop also has some competitive overlap with us. What am I thinking?

To compete or to collaborate? Beyond that and a seemingly crazier question: to block work from competitors or refer it to them? I’ve prioritized getting to know as many people in our business as I possibly can in the Houston market. I often have coffee with direct competitors. I often share ideas and work with people that could easily replicate it and take credit. It’s quite possible that I’m too young and naive to realize the risk I’m taking on…I acknowledge that.

However, I can’t help but feel like the creative community in a city like Houston (not typically known for its creative brilliance) is strengthened by the collaboration of competitors. Sure, we have to survive and protect our client relationships. But in the interest of authenticity, efficiency and quality, don’t we do our clients a disservice by attempting to do work we know we’re not very good at instead of referring it to someone else that does it very well? Will the client view that as an act of good faith and honesty? Or will the client walk right on through the open door you’ve just presented to them and leave you standing in the cold? Either one is possible, and if you do this long enough, both will probably happen at some point.

So let’s look at this from the perspective of the Marketing Director and the perspective of the agency.

  • If I’m a Marketing Director, I want the shop that (1) I can implicitly trust to be authentic and honest at every turn, whether that means turning down money or not and (2) has my best interests in mind and actually shows me. I don’t want the shop that tries to convince me all I need is video, when I know video is what they do best. When I ask that shop to help me with some SEO work, I sure hope they’ll refer me to a specialist if all they’ll be doing is taking my money and Googling SEO.

  • If I’m an agency Account Manager, it’s in my best interest, long-term, to maintain a good reputation in my market. I may pitch against you, but I’m not going to talk poorly of you to prospective clients to win work and I’m not going to accept work that you could do far better for the same price and at the same speed. (Note: If you don’t have something that you do better than everyone else in your market, than you may want to stop reading this blog and work on that) As I discussed in a guest blog post for Hullabalog, these competitors may become clients prospects, and many of them do. Yes, I would say that there’s a “plethora” of reasons to respect your competition and maybe even befriend them.

    I’m confident in saying that you’ll get burned far more if you’re the cut-throat business owner that will tell your client anything to win more business and disrespect your competition. Sure, both approaches have worked in the past. But we’re also not currently living in the past. Cut-throat competitive and management strategy isn’t going anywhere, but it’s success rate sure is. Treat people well. Your employees, your clients and yes, even your competition.

    What do you think? The words of a naive “kid” in the business who needs a few more rodeos under his belt?

  • Real-life Games

    March 14, 2011 Leave a comment


    I sat in my chair yesterday evening at 5:00pm CST and anxiously awaited CBS to reveal the tournament bracket for the 2011 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament. There’s a show for it…every year…in prime time…and is one of the most popular sporting “events” that does not actually involve the sport itself. Sure, I’ve got a team that I root for relentlessly, but the cache of the tournament has very little to do with your team; it’s about the game.

    Think fantasy football or the movie “Rat Race“. These things tap into the competitive part of our psyche, but what makes them unique is the real-life nature of the playing board. We’re much less fascinated with moving pieces around a board and putting it back in the box when the game’s over. We still want to play, and we still want to win, but we’ve firmly jumped on board with the concept that we can play these games with the actions of real people – and that makes it far more engaging. And we spend exponentially more time playing (or watching to see if we got it right). Ultimately, we want to root for someone. Very few watch sporting events where they don’t care about the outcome. We begin to care about the outcome when there’s a story we’re following or a game we’re playing, which directly affects whether we win or lose. And that’s what we want right? We want consumers to care and become emotionally invested…maybe even evangelists for your brand.

    If you’ve read any marketing/branding book, you probably know that telling stories is essential to creating emotional attachment to your team / brand. Have you ever thought about giving them a low-risk, real-life game to play? I specify “low-risk” because if you’re a publicly-traded company, investors are already playing a real-life game, but your consumers can’t take that level of risk. No specific ideas here, but an application to think about. This is a very real aspect of our current media-driven culture that heavily impacts the revenue success of college basketball and the NFL – but it’s rarely tapped into.

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.