Why At-home 3D is a Long Way Off – If It Hits At All
I’m usually one to get on the bandwagon, and yes, I loved Avatar in 3D. From IMAX to regular theaters to…at home is the natural next step in the progression. ESPN announced earlier this month that it would launch a 3D network in the coming year. Disney’s on board. Sony’s on board. LG is launching a new line of 3D televisions in 2010. With names like that, do consumers really have any choice? Keeping in line with my identification as a bandwagoner, I would not-so-boldy predict that just as home television viewing transitioned to HD over the past few years, 3D networks will be the next in line, and in 5 short years, we won’t be viewing anything not in 3D.
Not this time.
I see the pull and the “coolness” factor is absolutely present. For advertisers, what an opportunity to create a much more engaging experience for our target audiences. We’re not extending outside the sense of sight, but we’re getting a lot closer to touch. This is significant. But I believe we’re going to need to find another way to do it.
4 Reasons why at-home 3D viewing is a long way off:
1. Peripheral distraction. 3D experiences in IMAX and even ordinary movie theaters work because it immerses the viewer in the experience. This is fairly obvious but worth noting. If you’ve got a 7-footer sitting in the seat right in front of you, it can ruin the entire experience. If the screen was half the size and your peripheral vision allowed you to see a significant amount on either side of the screen, the experience is compromised. Why do you think IMAX screens are so stinkin’ huge? Drop a 42-50″ screen on a wall, 10-20′ from the viewer and you’ve got all kinds of problems. Is it even worth trying to provide a 3D experience with all of the distraction your peripheral vision will catch? For sports viewing, movies, Discovery channel, whatever, this would actually seem a bit corny.
2. Viewing Angles. Again, the result of most of us not having a 20′ projection media room in our homes means that you’ll have to position yourself directly in front of your television to avoid distorting the experience. Remember early flatscreen technology that prevented viewership from a 45 degree angle? Well, we fixed that, but what are we going to do if 3D is the next big thing?
3. Glasses. Call this a gut instinct, but I don’t think people will want to have to wear glasses at home to watch tv. Will we just have a set of glasses for everyone in the household right next to the remotes? No more multi-tasking. Unless you want to fold laundry and work on your work laptop with vision distorting glasses, you’re either watching tv and nothing else, or you’re not watching at all. This is actually a step backwards.
4. Money. Along with any other tech advancement, the pricing will start high and decrease. The current economy certainly isn’t very conducive to a new expensive technology, but on top of that, who wants to buy a special cable box, a new tv, glasses and upgraded cable? Not this guy.
I get it. This is (relatively) new technology with a lot of momentum and chatter. I’d love to jump on the bandwagon, but a combination of rational thought and personal intuition seem to stack the cards in the other direction. But this is much more fun as a two-way conversation than a list. Thoughts?
